Author Topic: [Attn: TA] Defection?  (Read 3935 times)

Offline Kiskla Grayson

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,008
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #40 on: 07/28/12 04:59:59 »
That sounds fine.
Who would be your IC Alliance contact, to organize your escape? Alestor?
Ie. How do we know where you are, and that we'd be needed there.. ha

Offline Gaven13

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,117
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #41 on: 07/28/12 05:44:49 »
Ave, what she said ^

GIVE US DETAILS OR I SHALL TAKE YOUR SOUL.

....wait, what?  >.>

Offline AvadreiaLacroix

  • Member
  • Posts: 283
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #42 on: 07/28/12 06:09:28 »
Let's not get hasty. I'd like Immo's input before we start wrecking his capitol. It won't do to make highly trained Imperial troops seem like sad little pushovers, that would irritate the shit out of people.

Offline Kiskla Grayson

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,008
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #43 on: 07/28/12 06:11:49 »
Yeah, I wouldn't mind meeting some fair opposition. Make you something worth fighting for, eh eh?

Offline Gaven13

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,117
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #44 on: 07/28/12 06:58:01 »
I never said I was being hasty. I am, however, quite hungry for a soul. Yours may do nicely. >.>

Offline Darth Immortus

  • Member
  • Posts: 822
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #45 on: 07/28/12 12:41:35 »
Let's see.  I'd advise against making this a full-blown Alliance military operation, unless you are willing to start a war with the Empire.  The reason for this is because if the Empire sees numerous Alliance vessels in Imperial territory (the capital, no less), then the Empire will be hostile.  You would also have to have a massive invasion force to commit to this, because this is the Imperial capital planet and city after all, and is quite well fortified.  Sending in just a few ships won't do the trick.  And, if the Alliance did show up with numerous vessels, a large battle would ensue.  I'm assuming this isn't what you're looking to do, since not only would it start a war, but it would require you to put in way more resources than is really necessary for helping one person escape.

It needs to be a clandestine operation.  The Jedi attempting to rescue Avadreia should appear as unassuming as possible; fly in on a typical freighter disguised as commoners, and have some kind of fake identifications in order to get past check points in the starports.  In other words, this operation should be completely off the books.  Then there's the issue of getting inside the Imperial Palace.  I wouldn't even attempt this, since it is so heavily guarded that people disguised as commoners wouldn't be able to access anywhere of importance, and if the Jedi are discovered and their cover is blown, they're completely screwed.  However, Avadreia could easily be in a place other than the Palace.  Perhaps Ava could contact the Alliance, or vice versa, and a meeting place could be arranged.

Not trying to plan this whole thing out for you guys, but these are just some thoughts.

Offline AvadreiaLacroix

  • Member
  • Posts: 283
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #46 on: 07/28/12 12:44:31 »
A covert-operation is what I was thinking!

Offline Gaven13

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,117
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #47 on: 07/28/12 13:57:28 »
Agreed.

Offline Ethan Zarkot

  • Member
  • Posts: 111
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #48 on: 07/29/12 05:47:59 »
I thought we were going to have a war there for a second.

Offline Gaven13

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,117
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #49 on: 07/29/12 06:13:32 »
War is far too messy. We, the Jedi, need a small team. 4-5, at the most. 4 can slip into a secure city far easier than 4000.

Offline Kiskla Grayson

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,008
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #50 on: 07/29/12 07:46:27 »
Oh, I too had the understanding it was a tiny mission.
Glad we're all agreed now, then.

Woop woop!

Offline Gaven13

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,117
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #51 on: 07/29/12 11:37:49 »
Boss lady gets to pick when we start! 

Offline AvadreiaLacroix

  • Member
  • Posts: 283
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #52 on: 07/30/12 23:28:27 »
Kiskla and Gaven, do you two have AIM? This might go smoother if we can plot in real time.

Offline Kiskla Grayson

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,008
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #53 on: 07/31/12 05:27:01 »
I'll give you both via PM.
(Save you some time, Gav)

Offline AvadreiaLacroix

  • Member
  • Posts: 283
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #54 on: 07/31/12 15:14:30 »
http://swdescension.com/roleplay...9/master/1/#.UBissqNmPAk

So that happened. I think we can do some preliminary set-up before the action begins without having to coordinate too much, but this will give us all something to do while we try to get in touch and hammer out the details, yes?

Offline Kiskla Grayson

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,008
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #55 on: 07/31/12 15:45:23 »
Excellent.
I'll be home, and on AIM shortly C:

Offline Gaven13

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,117
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #56 on: 08/02/12 13:31:26 »
Hit me up Kiskla!

Offline AvadreiaLacroix

  • Member
  • Posts: 283
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #57 on: 08/02/12 13:41:45 »
I don't see you online! Someone save me!

Offline Darth Immortus

  • Member
  • Posts: 822
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #58 on: 08/02/12 13:45:55 »
The Alliance are a bunch of slowpokes!

Offline AvadreiaLacroix

  • Member
  • Posts: 283
  • Karma: +0/-0
[Attn: TA] Defection?
« Reply #59 on: 08/02/12 14:50:55 »
Okay, I guess we'll need to schedule something in advance. When is everyone available, what time zones are you in, and what method of communication shall we use?